4.6 Article

Aging differentially alters the expression of angiogenic genes in a tissue-dependent manner

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.03.098

关键词

Aging; Angiogenesis; Age-related disease; Metabolic disorder; White adipose tissue

资金

  1. [KAKENHI-23591107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organ functions are altered and impaired during aging, thereby resulting in increased morbidity of age-related diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and heart failure in the elderly. Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis, and aging is known to reduce the angiogenic capacity in many tissues. Here, we report the differential effects of aging on the expression of angiogenic factors in different tissues, representing a potentially causes for age-related metabolic disorders. PCR-array analysis revealed that many of angiogenic genes were down-regulated in the white adipose tissue (WAT) of aged mice, whereas they were largely up-regulated in the skeletal muscle (SM) of aged mice compared to that in young mice. Consistently, blood vessel density was substantially reduced and hypoxia was exacerbated in WAT of aged mice compared to that in young mice. In contrast, blood vessel density in SM of aged mice was well preserved and was not different from that in young mice. Moreover, we identified that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress was strongly induced in both WAT and SM during aging in vivo. We also found that ER stress significantly reduced the expression of angiogenic genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, whereas it increased their expression in C2C12 myotubes in vitro. These results collectively indicate that aging differentially affects the expression of angiogenic genes in different tissues, and that aging-associated down-regulation of angiogenic genes in WAT, at least in part through ER stress, is potentially involved in the age-related adipose tissue dysfunction. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据