4.6 Article

Preconditioning effects of physiological cyclic stretch on pathologically mechanical stretch-induced alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis and barrier dysfunction

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.03.063

关键词

Cytoskeleton; Actin; RhoA GTPase; Rac GTPase; Lung injury; Mechanical ventilation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund, China [81171838]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Yangzhou, China [SGG201030033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We aim to investigate the effects of preconditioning of physiological cyclic stretch on the alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis induced by pathologically mechanical stretch and barrier dysfunction and how these effects are linked to differential expression of small GTPases Rac and Rho mRNA. Methods: Pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells were subjected to different treatments of cyclic stretch (CS) at 5% and 20% elongation, respectively. Cells maintained in normal cell culture were used as negative control. On the other hand, cell apoptosis and Rac/Rho activities in cells with or without preconditioning of physiologically relevant magnitudes of CS (5% CS) with different durations (0, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min) in prior to 6-h treatment with pathological CS stimulation (20% CS) were compared and measured. Results: Pathological CS could cause a significant increase in apoptosis rate, which is considered to be associated with the repression of Rac mRNA and activation of Rho mRNA. In contrast, physiological 5%-CS preconditioning suppressed cell apoptosis and induced nearly complete monolayer recovery with fewer actin stress fibers and paracellular gap formation. Consistent with differential effects on cell apoptosis and epithelial cell integrity, physiological CS preconditioning enhanced expression of Rac mRNA but inhibited Rho activation. Conclusions: Physiological CS preconditioning has an inhibitory effect on cell apoptosis while exerts a stimulatory impact on epithelial cell recovery via regulation of Rac and Rho activities. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据