4.6 Review

Tai chi: physiological characteristics and beneficial effects on health

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 148-156

出版社

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.35.3.148

关键词

Tai Chi Chuan; elderly; fails; cardiovascular; ventilation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives-To assess the characteristic effects of Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) exercise on metabolism and cardiorespiratory response, and to measure its effect on cardiorespiratory function, mental control, immune capacity, and the prevention of falls in elderly people. Design-A review of controlled experimental studies and clinical trials designed with one of two aims: either to assess physiological responses during the performance of TCC or to assess the impact of this exercise on general health and fitness. Main outcome measures-Metabolic rate, heart rate, blood pressure, ventilation, maximal oxygen uptake (< (V)over dot >O(2)MAX), immune capacity, falls, and fall related factors. Subjects-A total of 2216 men and women. Results-Under review were 31 original studies, published in Chinese or English journals, that met the criteria for inclusion. Most of the papers written in Chinese had not been introduced into the Western literature. Nine of these studies showed that TCC can be classified as moderate exercise, as its does not demand more than 55% of maximal oxygen intake. When this form of exercise and others conducted at equal intensity were compared, TCC showed a significantly lower ventilatory equivalent (< (V)over dot >E/< (V)over dot >O(2)MAX). Evidence provided by cross sectional and longitudinal studies suggests that TCC exercise has beneficial effects on cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal function, posture control capacity, and the reduction of falls experienced by the elderly. Conclusions-TCC is a moderate intensity exercise that is beneficial to cardiorespiratory function, immune capacity, mental control, flexibility, and balance control; it improves muscle strength and reduces the risk of falls in the elderly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据