4.7 Review

Pathophysiology of limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A:: hypothesis and new insights into the IκBα/NF-κB survival pathway in skeletal muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 79, 期 5-6, 页码 254-261

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s001090100225

关键词

skeletal muscle; LGMD2A; apoptosis; I kappa B alpha; NF-kappa B

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) are a group of clinically heterogeneous genetic diseases characterized by progressive weakness and atrophy of scapular and pelvic muscles, with either a dominant or recessive autosomic mode of inheritance. The first symptoms of the disorder appear during the first 20 years of life and progresses gradually, and a walking disability develops 10-20 years later. The gene responsible for LGMD2A has been identified and encodes calpain 3, a protease expressed mainly in skeletal muscle. Apoptotic myonuclei were recently detected in muscular biopsy specimens of LGMD2A patients, and apoptosis was found to be correlated with altered subcellular distribution of inhibitory protein kappaB alpha (I kappaB alpha) and nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB), resulting in sarcoplasmic sequestration of NF-kappaB. Calpain 3 dependent I kappaB alpha degradation was reconstituted in vitro, supporting a possible in vivo sequence of events leading from calpain 3 deficiency to I kappaB alpha accumulation, prevention of nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB, and ultimately apoptosis. Therefore calpain 3, present in healthy muscle as sarcoplasmic and nuclear forms, may control I kappaB alpha turnover and indirectly regulate NF-kappaB dependent expression of survival genes. Recent data reported from a new model of LGMD2A in mice and from other muscular disorders strengthen understanding of the molecular links between calpain 3 and the I kappaB alpha NF-kappaB pathway. Finally, in light of the lack of apoptosis observed in inflammatory myopathies, a unifying, model for the control of cell survival in muscle is proposed and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据