3.8 Article

Reverse transcriptase template switching during reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: Artificial generation of deletions in ribonucleotide reductase mRNA

期刊

JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 137, 期 6, 页码 422-428

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mlc.2001.115452

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), we have recently described a bona tide deletion within the coding sequence of the large subunit of ribonucleotide reductase (R1) mRNA in colon cancer. Consecutive studies have raised questions about the nature of this phenomenon, because the corresponding genomic alteration at the DNA level or an aberrant protein could not be detected. Thus we considered an in vitro artifact during RT-PCR as a possible explanation for this observation. In contrast to reverse transcriptase, Tag DNA polymerase or C. therm DNA polymerase did not generate the aberrant product, suggesting the demand for the template switching activity intrinsic to retroviral reverse transcriptases. In fact, virtually the same deletion was observed in RT-PCR experiments when in vitro transcribed R1 mRNA was used. Considering structural prerequisites for template switching within R1 mRNA, we show that two direct repeats adjacent to a strong stem-loop secondary structure flank the deleted region of 1851 base pairs. Because several mRNAs encoding proteins of clinical and diagnostic importance fulfill these criteria, template switching enhances the potential risk of observing artifacts when interpreting results from RT-PCR studies. As shown in the present example, this may involve the artificial generation and the misinterpretation of PCR fragments amplified from targets relevant to tumor biology or cancer pharmacology. As a possible solution, one-step PCR with C, therm polymerase should be considered. This polymerase eliminates the artificial generation of aberrant mRNA signals observed during cDNA synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据