3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Factors regulating the cytotoxic activity of the human natural killer cell line, NK-92

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PUBL
DOI: 10.1089/152581601750288975

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NK-92, a highly cytotoxic, interleukin-2 (IL-2)-dependent human natural killer (NK) cell line, has been of interest for basic and translational research. We report on a comprehensive analysis of NK-92 for factors implicated in NK cytotoxicity to elucidate factors underlying NK-92's high cytolytic activity and target range. Thus, we hope to develop a method to identify patients best suited to NK-92 immunotherapy. In addition, as a model system, we hope to increase understanding of the basis for the elevated activity exhibited by activated NK (ANK) cells. NK-92 exhibits an unusual receptor expression profile, expressing a relatively large number of activating (NKp30, NKp46, 2B4, NKGD, E, CD28) receptors. Conversely, it expresses few inhibitory receptors (NKGA/B, low levels of KIR2DL4, ILT-2), lacking most of the killer inhibitory receptors (KIRs) clonally expressed on normal NK cells. In addition, NK-92 expresses high levels of molecules involved in the perforin-granzyme cytolytic pathway as well as additional cytotoxic effector molecules including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-super-family members FasL, TRAIL, TWEAK, TNF-alpha, indicating the ability to kill via alternative mechanisms. NK-92 also expresses other molecules implicated immune effector cell regulation (CD80, CD86, CD40L, TRANCE) whose relevance in NK killing is unclear. This study provides initial data to develop a method to identify NK-92 susceptible cells (cells expressing ligands for NK-92 activating receptors ie CD48 for 2B4 and CD80/86 for CD28). Furthermore, this work suggests mechanisms that may contribute to ANK cell activity, including modulation of receptor expression to favor activation, up-regulation of cytotoxic effector molecules, and acquisition of new cytolytic pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据