4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A social conflict increases EEG slow-wave activity during subsequent sleep

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 331-335

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00451-6

关键词

sleep; EEG; spectral analysis; slow-wave activity; stress; social conflict

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electroencephalogram (EEG) slow-wave activity (SWA) during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep is widely viewed as an indicator of sleep debt and sleep intensity. In a previous study, we reported a strong increase in SWA during NREM sleep after a social conflict in rats. To test whether this increase in SWA reflects normal physiological sleep or an unrelated by-product of the stress, we now measured the effect of a conflict in combination with extended sleep deprivation by means of gentle handling. We anticipated that if the social defeat-induced SWA reflects a true sleep debt, the drive for it would persist during the extended wakefulness. Male rats were subjected to a l-h social conflict followed by 5 h of sleep deprivation by gentle handling or to 6 h gentle handling alone. The manipulations took place during the second half of the dark phase and recovery sleep was recorded during the subsequent light phase. Neither of thr two procedures caused a significant change in the total duration of NREM or REM sleep thereafter. Yet, both modes of sleep deprivation induced a strong increase in SWA during NREM sleep. This SWA was significantly higher for 6 h after sleep deprivation consisting of a social conflict followed by gentle handling, as compared to sleep deprivation by handling alone. Thus, the SWA increasing effect of the conflict persisted during the extended wakefulness. The data confirm that social defeat stress accelerates the build up of sleep debt and support the notion that sleep debt and subsequent NREM sleep intensity not only depend on the duration of prior wakefulness but also on what animals experience during that waking. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据