4.6 Article

Human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 functions as an estrogen receptor α signaling modulator

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.09.017

关键词

Estrogen receptor alpha; Glutathione S-transferase P1-1; Estrogen response element; Regulatory interacting protein 140; Breast cancer

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korea - Korea government (MSIP) [2011-0030074, 2012-045128, 2014-046690]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) plays a crucial role in estrogen-mediated signaling pathways and exerts its action as a nuclear transcription factor. Binding of the ligand-activated ERa to the estrogen response element (ERE) is a central part of ER alpha-associated signal transduction pathways and its aberrant modulation is associated with many disease conditions. Human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP) functions as an enzyme in conjugation reactions in drug metabolism and as a regulator of kinase signaling pathways. It is overexpressed in tumors following chemotherapy and has been associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. In this study, a novel regulatory function of GSTP has been proposed in which GSTP modulates ERE-mediated ERa signaling events. Ectopic expression of GSTP was able to induce the ERa and ERE-mediated transcriptional activities in ER alpha-positive but GSTP-negative MCF7 human breast cancer cells. This inductive effect of GSTP on the ERE-transcription activity was diminished when the cells express a mutated form of the enzyme or are treated with a GSTP-specific chemical inhibitor. It was found that GSTP inhibited the expression of the receptor interacting protein 140 (RIP140), a negative regulator of ERa transcription, at both mRNA and protein levels. Our study suggests a novel non-enzymatic role of GSTP which plays a significant role in regulating the classical ERa signaling pathways via modification of transcription cofactors such as RIP140. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据