4.7 Article

Platelet GPIIb/IIIa binding characteristics of small molecule RGD mimetic: distinct binding profile for Roxifiban

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 133, 期 3, 页码 331-336

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703943

关键词

GPIIb/IIIa; integrin; fibrinogen; roxifiban; orbofiban; sibrafiban; RGD; platelets; binding kinetics; confocal microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 A number of non-peptide orally active RGD mimetic prodrug such as Orbofiban, Sibrafiban, SR121566, Roxifiban and others entered into the clinical evaluation stage. Some of these agents were terminated and some are still in clinical trials. 2 The present study examined the platelet GPIIb/IIIa binding profiles for the active form of Roxifiban, Sibrafiban, SR121566 and Orbofiban using H-3-Roxifiban active form (XV459), H-3-DMP728, I-125-Echistatin, and I-125-Fibrinogen. 3 Either DMP728, Orbofiban, Sibrafiban, SR121566 or Roxifiban active form as well as other RGD mimetic bind to the same binding site (s) on human platelets as evident from the competitive inhibition of binding of each other to human platelet. Additionally, Roxifiban active form competed with FITC labeled GPIIb/IIIa antagonist cyclic RGD peptidomimetic (XL086) as demonstrated using confocal microscopy technique. 4 Roxifiban active form (XV459) demonstrated the highest potency in inhibiting H-3-XV459, H-3-DMP728, I-125-Echistatin, and I-125-Fibrinogen binding to human platelets as compared to the others. 5 Structure activity relationship within the isoxazoline Roxifiban series showed that substituent at the alpha -carbon next to the carboxy terminal represents an exosite for the affinity binding to human platelets leading to slow platelet dissociation rate. 6 These data indicated a distinct binding profile for Roxifiban (high affinity to both activated and resting platelets associated with a relatively slow K-off) as compared to others. These differences might determine the pharmacodynamics and pharmackokinetics of the different GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据