4.7 Article

Speciation of essential elements in human serum using anion-exchange chromatography coupled to post-column isotope dilution analysis with double focusing ICP-MS

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 587-592

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b100947h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential of anion-exchange chromatography coupled to double focusing ICP-MS via a post-column isotope dilution analysis mode for the quantitative speciation of Fe, Cu and Zn in human serum is described. Protein separation was achieved with an anion-exchange column (Mono-Q HR 5/5) while the mobile phase consisted of a gradient of initial buffer solution (0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH=7.4) and the final buffer solution (0.5 M ammonium acetate in 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH = 7.4). After protein separation, a mixed solution containing the enriched isotopes, Fe-57. Cu-65 and Zn-67, was continuously pumped and mixed with the biological species eluting from the column. The analytical signals for Fe (Fe-56/Fe-57), Cu (Cu-63/Cu-65) and Zn (Zn-64/Zn-67) were monitored on a double-focusing inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) instrument operated at medium resolving power (m/Deltam = 3000). This resolution allowed adequate separation of polyatomic interferences affecting the main isotopes of Fe, Cu and Zn in serum. The conventional abundance, vs. time chromatogram obtained was converted to a mass flow chromatogram and the amount of metal in the different fractions (biomolecules) was obtained by integration of such chromatographic peaks. Total metal contents of Fe, Cu and Zn were also determined by direct isotope dilution analysis (IDA) of the serum samples, diluted 1:20, using the same ICP-MS. The method proposed was finally applied to the speciation of serum samples from healthy volunteers and patients on hemodialysis. Some speciation differences were observed between both populations, particularly for Fe speciation, indicating that quantitative speciation studies could be useful for disease diagnostic purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据