4.6 Article

Expression of somatostatin receptors on human pituitary adenomas in vivo and ex vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 430-437

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03351043

关键词

pituitary adenomas; somatostatin receptors; GnRH receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution and biologic activity of somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR) in pituitary adenomas is not clarified, especially regarding clinically non-functioning adenomas (NFPA). We therefore characterized SSTR in human pituitary adenomas by combining molecular biology and in vivo scintigraphy. Go-expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) mRNA was also assessed to see whether this feature was associated with adenoma subtype and SSTR status. Pituitary tumor biopsies were obtained during transsphenoidal adenomectomy from 21 patients (11 NFPA, 7 acromegalics, 2 prolactinomas, 1 Cushing's disease). Expression of mRNA encoding the 5 known SSTR subtypes and the GnRH-R was determined by RT-PCR. Twelve patients also underwent a pre-operative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Most adenomas (no = 18) expressed mRNA for more than one SSTR. SSTR2 mRNA was expressed in 18 cases, whereas SSTR4 was absent in all but one. SSTR3 was frequently expressed in NFPAs. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was positive in most cases, and with a significantly higher uptake index in GH-producing adenomas all of which expressed SSTR2 mRNA. The uptake index appeared to be related to receptor density rather than tumor volume. Expression of GnRH-R mRNA was found in both NFPAs and GH-producing adenomas and was not significantly associated with a particular SSTR subtype population. In conclusion: 1) the distribution of SSTR is not significantly different between NFPA and GH-producing adenomas; and 2) somatostatin receptor scintigraphy reveals a higher uptake in GH-producing adenomas which is not significantly related to either SSTR distribution or tumor volume. (J. Endocrinol. Invest. 24: 430-437, 2001) (C) 2001, Editrice Kurtis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据