4.6 Article

Specific inhibition of hepatitis C virus entry into host hepatocytes by fungi-derived sulochrin and its derivatives

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.100

关键词

HCV; Entry; Sulochrin; Natural product; Screening; Compound

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24102537, 24115003] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major causative agent of hepatocellular carcinoma. Although various classes of anti-HCV agents have been under clinical development, most of these agents target RNA replication in the HCV life cycle. To achieve a more effective multidrug treatment, the development of new, less expensive anti-HCV agents that target a different step in the HCV life cycle is needed. We prepared an in-house natural product library consisting of compounds derived from fungal strains isolated from seaweeds, mosses, and other plants. A cell-based functional screening of the library identified sulochrin as a compound that decreased HCV infectivity in a multi-round HCV infection assay. Sulochrin inhibited HCV infection in a dose-dependent manner without any apparent cytotoxicity up to 50 mu M. HCV pseudoparticle and trans-complemented particle assays suggested that this compound inhibited the entry step in the HCV life cycle. Sulochrin showed anti-HCV activities to multiple HCV genotypes la, 1b, and 2a. Co-treatment of sulochrin with interferon or a protease inhibitor telaprevir synergistically augmented their anti-HCV effects. Derivative analysis revealed anti-HCV compounds with higher potencies (IC50 < 5 mu M). This is the first report showing an antiviral activity of methoxybenzoate derivatives. Thus, sulochrin derivatives are anti-HCV lead compounds with a new mode of action. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据