4.8 Article

Differential effects of microsomal enzyme-inducing chemicals on the hepatic expression of rat organic anion transporters, OATP1 and OATP2

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1469-1478

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.25088

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-07079, ES-09649, ES-03192] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The organic anion transporting polypeptides, Oatp1 (Sl21a1) and Oatp2 (Slc21a5), mediate hepatic uptake of cardiac glycosides. Previously, we demonstrated that chemicals that increase cytochrome P450s differentially affect hepatic uptake of cardiac glycosides. We postulated that increased uptake of cardiac glycosides observed after pretreatment of animals with phenobarbital (PB) and pregnenolone-16 alpha -carbonitrile (PCN) occurs via increased hepatic expression of Oatp1 and/or Oatp2. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with PB, PCN, 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC), or vehicle for 4 days. Branched-DNA (bDNA) signal amplification and Western blot analyses were used to assess hepatic Oatp1 and Oatp2 mRNA and protein, respectively. The expression of Oatp1 was not increased by any chemical treatment. Increases in Oatp2 expression were observed from livers of rats treated with PB and PCN, in which PCN caused a robust elevation of Oatp2 mRNA and protein. Oatp2 expression was suppressed in response to 3-MC. To determine the temporal effects of PCN treatment on the expression of Oatp2, rats were administered PCN, livers were extracted at various times, and Oatp2 expression was analyzed. Maximal expression of Oatp2 mRNA was observed at 24 hours and remained elevated, whereas the amount of Oatp2 protein increased throughout the 96-hour interval. The finding that Oatp2 expression increases in response to PB and PCN is consistent with our previous findings that PB and PCN enhance hepatic uptake of cardiac glycosides. These results suggest that Oatp2, but not Oatp1, is inducible by PB and PCN, which imparts the increased capacity of the liver to extract cardiac glycosides from the plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据