4.6 Article

Upper mantle attenuation and velocity structure from measurements of differential S phases

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 145, 期 3, 页码 615-630

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.01395.x

关键词

attenuation; S waves; differential measurements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although much progress has been made in determining the 3-D distribution of seismic wave velocities in the Earth. substantially less is known about the 3-D distribution of intrinsic attenuation. In this study variations in attenuation and shear velocity of the Earth's mantle are constrained using measurements of differential traveltime and attenuation. The data are broad-band displacement SH seismograms filtered to have energy in the period range 8-20 s. The seismograms are obtained from over 600 globally distributed earthquakes of magnitude, M-w, 5.5 or greater. Differential traveltimes and differential t* values from multiple S phases are estimated by a waveform-fitting method, resulting in approximately 4300 measurements for SS-S in the distance range 50 degrees -105 degrees and 1000 measurements for SSS-SS in the distance range 90 degrees -179 degrees. Each measurement consists of a differential traveltime and a corresponding differential t*. The differential traveltimes and t* values are inverted to obtain models of the lateral variation of shear velocity and lateral variation of q(mu) where q(mu)=1/Q(mu) The models explain the data well but have limited depth resolution. The velocity models show good correlation with previous studies: in particular, low velocities are observed underlying mid-oceanic ridges and convergent margins and high velocities are found for continental regions. The q(mu) models show shield regions to be less attenuating than PREM, with ridges appearing as highly attenuating features. The models have limited depth resolution and to address this problem we also present a shear velocity model obtained from the combination of body wave and surface wave data sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据