4.6 Article

Effects of the gout-causing Q141K polymorphism and a CFTR ΔF508 mimicking mutation on the processing and stability of the ABCG2 protein

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.054

关键词

ABCG2; Polymorphism; Gout; Cystic fibrosis; Stability; Structure

资金

  1. MB08C-80039
  2. OTKA [83533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ABCG2 is an important multidrug transporter involved also in urate transport, thus its mutations can lead to the development of gout and may also alter general drug absorption, distribution and excretion. The frequent ABCG2 polymorphism, Q141K, is associated with an elevated risk of gout and has been controversially reported to reduce the plasma membrane expression and/or the transport function of the protein. In the present work we examined the stability and cellular processing of the Q141K ABCG2 variant, as well as that of the Delta F142 ABCG2, corresponding to the Delta F508 mutation in the CFTR (ABCC7) protein, causing cystic fibrosis. The processing ad localization of full length ABCG2 variants were investigated in mammalian cells, followed by Western blotting and confocal microscopy, respectively. Folding and stability were examined by limited proteolysis of Sf9 insect cell membranes expressing these ABCG2 constructs. Stability of isolated nucleotide binding domains, expressed in and purified from bacteria, was studied by CD spectroscopy. We find that the Q141K variant has a mild processing defect which can be rescued by low temperature, a slightly reduced activity, and a mild folding defect, especially affecting the NBD. In contrast, the Delta F142 mutant has major processing and folding defects, and no ATPase function. We suggest that although these mutations are both localized within the NBD, based on molecular modeling their contribution to the ABCG2 structure and function is different, thus rescue strategies may be devised accordingly. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据