4.5 Article

DNA strand break-sensing molecule poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cooperates with p53 in telomere function, chromosome stability, and tumor suppression

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 4046-4054

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.12.4046-4054.2001

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA79493-01, R01 CA079493] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI029524, R01AI29524] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM56162] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic instability is often caused by mutations in genes that are involved in DNA repair and/or cell cycle checkpoints, and it plays an important role in tumorigenesis. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a DNA strand break-sensing molecule that is involved in the response to DNA damage and the maintenance of telomere function and genomic stability. We report here that, compared to single-mutant cells, PARP and p53 double-mutant cells exhibit many severe chromosome aberrations, including a high degree of aneuploidy, fragmentations, and end-to-end fusions, which may be attributable to telomere dysfunction, While PARP(-/-) cells showed telomere shortening and p53(-/-) cells showed normal telomere length, inactivation of PARP in p53(-/-) cells surprisingly resulted in very long and heterogeneous telomeres, suggesting a functional interplay between PARP and p53 at the telomeres, Strikingly, PARP deficiency widens the tumor spectrum in mice deficient in p53, resulting in a high frequency of carcinomas in the mammary gland, lung, prostate, and skin, as well as brain tumors, reminiscent of Li-Fraumeni syndrome in humans. The enhanced tumorigenesis is likely to be caused by PARP deficiency, which facilitates the loss of function of tumor suppressor genes as demonstrated by a high rate of loss of heterozygosity at the p53 locus in these tumors. These results indicate that PARP and p53 interact to maintain genome integrity and identify PARP as a cofactor for suppressing tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据