4.6 Article

Evidence that truncated TrkB isoform, TrkB-Shc can regulate phosphorylated TrkB protein levels

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.02.159

关键词

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Shc; Protein stability

资金

  1. Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [568884]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT0991986]
  4. Australian Research Council [FT0991986] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) is best known as the receptor for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In humans, three major isoforms of TrkB, the full-length receptor (TrkB-TK+) and two C-terminal truncated receptors (TrkB-TK- and TrkB-Shc) are expressed in various tissues. In comparison to TrkB-TK+ and TrkB-TK-, TrkB-Shc is less well characterized. In this study, we analyzed the biological function of the TrkB-Shc receptor in response to exogenous BDNF treatment. In experiments transiently overexpressing TrkB-Shc in CHOK1 cells, we found that TrkB-Shc protein levels were rapidly decreased when cells were exposed to exogenous BDNF. When we assessed the functional impact of TrkB-Shc on TrkB-TK+ activity, we found that phosphorylated TrkB-TK+ protein levels were significantly decreased in the presence of TrkB-Shc and moreso following BDNF exposure. Interestingly, while the reduction of phosphorylated TrkB-TK+ protein was more pronounced in the presence of TrkB-Shc following BDNF exposure, the stability of TrkB-Shc protein itself was increased. Our findings suggest that cells may increase TrkB-Shc protein levels in response to exogenous BDNF exposure to regulate TrkB-TK+ activity by increasing degradation of activated receptor complexes as a means to prevent overactivation or inappropriate temporal and spatial activation of BDNF/TrkB-TK+ signaling. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据