4.6 Article

Gender-specific compensation for the lack of NO in the mediation of flow-induced arteriolar dilation

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.6.H2456

关键词

NO synthesis; hyperpolarizing factor; cytochrome P-450 metabolites; potassium channels

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-43023, HL-46813] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow-induced dilation of gracilis muscle arterioles was examined in both genders of control rats and rats chronically treated with N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). After L-NAME treatment (4 wk), systolic blood pressure was significantly increased compared with control, whereas the plasma concentration of nitrate/nitrite was significantly reduced. Isolated and pressurized arterioles dilated significantly in response to increases in flow (0-25 mul/ min). Flow-induced dilation was comparable in arterioles of control and L-NAME-treated rats but was significantly greater in female than in male rats. L-NAME + indomethacin, which abolished flow- induced dilation in arterioles of male control rats, inhibited the dilation by only similar to 75% in female control rats. The residual portion of the response was eliminated by additional administration of miconazole, an inhibitor of cytochrome P-450. Indomethacin did not affect the dilation in female L-NAME- treated rats but completely inhibited the response in male L-NAME-treated rats. The indomethacin-insensitive, flow-induced dilation in female L-NAME-treated arterioles was abolished by miconazole, 6-( 2-proparglyoxyphenyl) hexanoic acid, or charybdotoxin. Thus an augmented release of endothelial prostaglandins accounts for the preserved flow-induced dilation in arterioles of male rats, whereas a metabolite of cytochrome P-450 is responsible for the maintenance of flow-induced dilation in female rats, suggesting important differences in the adaptation of the endothelium of arterioles from male and female rats to the lack of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据