4.8 Article

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1394-1403

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24563

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30DK26743] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The precise staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the size and number of lesions that predict recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has not been clearly established. We therefore analyzed the outcome of 70 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent OLT over a 12-year period at our institution. Pathologic tumor staging of the explanted liver was based on the American Tumor Study Group modified Tumor-Node-Metastases (TNM) Staging Classification. Tumor recurrence occurred in 11.4% of patients after OLT. The Kaplan-Meier survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 91.3% and 72.4%, respectively, for patients with pT1 or pT2 HCC; and 82.4% and 74.1%, respectively, for pT3 tumors (P =.87). Patients with pT4 tumors, however, had a significantly worse 1-year survival of 33.3% (P =.0001). An alpha -fetoprotein (AFP) level > 1,000 ng/mL, total tumor diameter > 8 cm, age greater than or equal to 55 years and poorly differentiated histologic grade were also significant predictors for reduced survival in univariate analysis. Only pT4 stage and total tumor diameter remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Patients with HCC meeting the following criteria: solitary tumor less than or equal to 6.5 cm, or less than or equal to 3 nodules with the largest lesion less than or equal to 4.5 cm and total tumor diameter less than or equal to 8 cm, had survival rates of 90% and 75.2%, at 1 and 5 years, respectively, after OLT versus a 50% 1-year survival for patients with tumors exceeding these limits (P = .0005). We conclude that the current criteria for OLT based on tumor size may be modestly expanded while still preserving excellent survival after OLT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据