4.7 Article

Regulatory volume decrease (RVD) by isolated and in situ bovine articular chondrocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 187, 期 3, 页码 304-314

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1077

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Articular chondrocytes in vivo are exposed to a changing osmotic environment under both physiological (static load) and pathological (osteoarthritis) conditions. Such changes to matrix hydration could alter cell volume in situ and influence matrix metabolism. However the ability of chondrocytes to regulate their volume in the face of osmotic perturbations have not been studied in detail. We have investigated the regulatory volume decrease (RVD) capacity of bovine articular chondrocytes within, and isolated from the matrix, before and following acute hypotonic challenge. Cell volumes were determined by visualising fluorescently-labelled chondrocytes using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at 21 degreesC. Chondrocytes in situ were grouped into superficial (SZ), mid (MZ), and deep zones (DZ). When exposed to 180mOsm or 250mOsm hypotonic challenge, cells in situ swelled rapidly (within similar to 90 sec). Chondrocytes then exhibited rapid RVD (t(1/2) similar to8 min), with cells from all zones returning to similar to3% of their initial volume after 20 min. There was no significant difference in the rates of RVD between chondrocytes in the three zones. Similarly, no difference in the rate of RVD was observed for an osmotic shock from 280 to 250 or 180mOsm. Chondrocytes isolated from the matrix into medium of 380mOsm and then exposed to 280mOsm showed an identical RVD response to that of in situ cells. The RVD response of in situ cells was inhibited by REV 5901. The results suggested that the signalling pathways involved in RVD remained intact after chondrocyte isolation from cartilage and thus it was likely that there was no role for cell-matrix interactions in mediating RVD. I. Cell. Physiol. 187: 304-314, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据