4.7 Article

Adjuvant immunotherapy is dependent on inducible nitric oxide synthase

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 193, 期 11, 页码 1261-1267

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.193.11.1261

关键词

experimental allergic encephalomyelitis; Freund's adjuvant; immunosuppression; interleukin 6; tumor necrosis factor alpha

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK42155, DK45346] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM07198] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rodents immunized with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) are resistant to subsequent attempts to induce autoimmune disease, while animals immunized with incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) remain susceptible. Mycobacterial extracts can stimulate inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) gene transcription. Robust expression of NOS2 has been linked to suppression of T cell proliferation and alterations in immune responses. Our studies investigated the hypothesis that the immunoprotective effect of CFA before immunization requires functional NOS2. NOS2 gene expression is chronically elevated in lymph nodes and spleens of CFA-immunized mice. Maximal expression of NOS2 after CFA immunization requires the presence of functional type I tumor necrosis factor a receptor (TNFR1) and interferon gamma. Groups of nontreated and CFA-preimmunized male C57BL/6J or C57BL/6NOS2(-/-) mice were immunized with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptide 35-55 in CFA to induce experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). Wild-type C57BL/6J mice were protected fi-om the development of symptoms of EAE, while the NOS2(-/-) mice failed to be protected. NOS2-dependent effects of CFA included an augmentation of the MOG-specific IgG1 response, a decrease in interleukin 6 production by MOG-reactive lymphocytes, and a marked decrease in mononuclear cell infiltrates in the central nervous system. These studies support the hypothesis that CFA immunization modulates immune responses through a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据