4.6 Article

Energy status determines the distinct biochemical and physiological behavior of interfibrillar and sub-sarcolemmal mitochondria

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.062

关键词

Interfibrillar mitochondria; Myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury; Sub-sarcolemmal mitochondria

资金

  1. Lady Davis foundation
  2. Pepka and Dr. Moshe Bergman Memorial Fund
  3. Joels Landovsky Fund (Hebrew University)
  4. German Israeli Fund (GIF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reports about the effect of ischemia and reperfusion on specific activities of the respiratory chain are often discrepant. One of the factors that govern this discrepancy is that typical mechanical procedures for mitochondrial isolation yield largely sub-sarcolemmal mitochondria (SSM), while the interfibrillar mitochondria (IFM), which provide most of the energy for the contractile apparatus, are under-represented. Here we investigated the impact of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion on SSM and IFM separately. Thirty-two Wister rats were randomly divided into four groups: control groups, ischemia groups, reperfusion groups and precondition groups. SSM and IFM were isolated from the rats' hearts from all the groups. The mitochondrial membrane potential (Delta psi) and swelling were assessed at energized (using either 5 mM succinate or 5 mM glutamate and 5 mM malate (GM) as a substrate) and non-energized conditions, where IFM showed better resistance to change in both conditions. Results showed that IFM have a higher coupling efficiency than SSM when energized by GM, but lower than SSM when energized with succinate. Preconditioning the rats' hearts prior to ischemia or reperfusion preserved the physiological and biochemical functions of both IFM and SSM and are energy dependent. The distinct physiological-biochemical functions of the mitochondrial sub-populations during ischemia and reperfusion depend on the overall energy status of the mitochondrial sub-population. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据