4.7 Article

Association between apolipoprotein E ε4 and sleep-disordered breathing in adults

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 285, 期 22, 页码 2888-2890

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2888

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR03186] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL62252] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [T32 AG00164, R01 AG14124] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [P30 MH40041] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [P50 NS23724] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 (ApoE epsilon4) is a well-known risk factor for Alzheimer disease and cardiovascular disease. Sleep-disordered breathing occurs in Alzheimer disease patients and increases risks for cardiovascular disease. Complex interactions among sleep, brain pathology, and cardiovascular disease may occur in ApoE epsilon4 carriers, Objective To study whether genetic variation at the level of ApoE is associated with sleep-disordered breathing or sleep abnormalities in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants Ongoing longitudinal cohort study of sleep disorders at a US university beginning in 1989, providing a population-based probability sample of 791 middle-aged adults (mean [SD] age, 49 [8] years; range, 32-68 years). Main Outcome Measure Nocturnal polysomnography to evaluate apnea-hypopnea index. Results The probability of moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing (apnea-hypopnea index greater than or equal to 15%) was significantly higher in participants with epsilon4, independent of age, sex, body mass index, and ethnicity (12.0% vs 7.0%; P=.003). Mean (SEM) apnea-hypopnea index was also significantly higher in participants with ApoE epsilon4 (6.5 [0.6] vs 4.8 [0.3]; P=.01). These effects increased with the number of ApoE epsilon4 alleles carried. Conclusions A significant portion of sleep-disordered breathing is associated with ApoE epsilon4 in the general population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据