4.6 Article

Human-mouse comparative sequence analysis of the NEMO gene reveals an alternative promoter within the neighboring G6PD gene

期刊

GENE
卷 271, 期 1, 页码 93-98

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00492-9

关键词

overlapping genes; 5 ' untranslated region; shared CpG island; binding motif

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NEMO (NF kappaB essential modulator) is a non-catalytic subunit of the cytokine-dependent I kappaB kinase complex that is involved in activation of the transcription factor NF kappaB. The human NEMO gene maps to Xq28 and is arranged head to head with the proximal G6PD gene. Mutations in NEMO have recently been associated with Incontinentia Pigmenti (Smahi et al., Nature 405 (2000) 466), an X-linked dominant disorder. Three alternative transcripts with different non-coding 5 ' exons (1a, 1b and 1c) of NEMO have been described. In order to identify regulatory elements that control alternative transcription we have established the complete genomic sequence of the murine orthologs Nemo and G6pdx. Sequence comparison suggests the presence of two alternative promoters for NEMO/Nemo. First, a CpG island is shared by both,Genes driving expression of the NEMO/Nemo transcripts containing exons lb and Ic in one direction and the housekeeping gene G6PD/G6pdx in the opposite direction. In contrast to human, an additional variant of exon 1c, named 1c+, was identified in several tissues of the mouse. This larger exon utilizes an alternative donor site located 1594 bp within intron 1c. The putative second promoter for NEMO/Nemo transcripts starting with exon la is unidirectional, and not associated with a CpG island. Surprisingly, this promoter is located in the second intron of G6PD/G6pdx. It shows very low basal activity and may be involved in stress/time- and/or tissue-dependent expression of NEMO. To our knowledge, an overlapping gene order similar to the G6PD/NEMO complex has not been described before. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据