4.4 Article

Initiating co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in HIV-infected patients in Africa: an evaluation of the provisional WHO/UNAIDS recommendations

期刊

AIDS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 1143-1148

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200106150-00009

关键词

co-trimoxazole; prophylaxis; HIV infection; AIDS; Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the proposed WHO/UNAIDS criteria for initiating co-trimox-azole prophylaxis in adult HIV-infected patients in Africa [WHO clinical stages 2-4 or CD4 count < 500 x 10(6) /l or total lymphocyte count (TLC) equivalent]. Design: Observational cohort study of 5-year follow-up. Setting: Adult HIV clinics, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Methods: Effect of prophylactic low dose co-trimoxazole (480 mg per day or 960 mg three times per week) on survival and morbidity was assessed in patients stratified by WHO clinical stage, CD4 T-lymphocyte count or TLC. Patients receiving antiretroviral therapy were excluded. Results: Co-trimoxazole reduced mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.85; P > 0.001] and the incidence of severe HIV-related illnesses (AHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; P < 0.001) in patients with evidence of advanced immune suppression on clinical (WHO stages 3 and 4) or laboratory assessment (TLC < 1250 x 10(6)/l or CD4 count < 200 x 10(6)/l). No significant evidence of efficacy was found in patients with WHO stage 2 or CD4 count 200-500 X 10(6)/l/TLC 1250-2000 X 10(6)/l. If we had applied the WHO/UNAIDS recommendations 88.3% of our patients would have received co-trimoxazole prophylaxis at their initial clinic visit. Conclusion: Co-trimoxazole in HIV-infected adults from an area in which Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia is uncommon demonstrated a survival benefit consistent with previous randomized trials. Further studies are needed to assess the optimal time of commencement of prophylaxis, as widespread co-trimoxazole use will lead to increasing antimicrobial resistance to other major pathogens in Africa. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据