4.4 Article

HIV dynamics and T-cell immunity after three structured treatment interruptions in chronic HIV-1 infection

期刊

AIDS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 F19-F27

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200106150-00001

关键词

chronic HIV infection; HAART; HIV dynamics; HIV-specific T cell response; structured treatment interruption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate whether controlled re-exposures to autologous HIV-1 could boost HIV-specific immunity and limit virus replication in patients with chronic HIV-1 infection. Patients and design: Subjects with at least 2 years virus suppression during antiretroviral therapy and a CD4:CD8 ratio > 1 were randomly assigned to interrupt highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) three times (n =12) or to continue their previous HAART (n = 14). Results: In 10/12 interrupter patients a rebound of HIV-1 RNA was detected in all three structured treatment interruptions (STI). Plasma virus doubling time was shorter during the first STI than in the second and third STI, corresponding to an average 13% reduction in viral basic reproductive rate. However, the mean time before plasma viral load rose to > 50 copies/ml was significantly shorter in the second and third STI. The average frequency of HIV-specific CD8 T cells in the interrupter patients at the end of the third STI cycle was significantly higher compared with the baseline and the end of the first STI. A substantial increase in HIV-specific CD8 T cell frequencies was found in four interrupter patients, whereas there were no changes in all 14 non-interrupter individuals. A weak p24-specific T helper response developed in 5/12 interrupter patients compared with no response in non-interrupters, but these responses were transient and disappeared rapidly. Conclusion: The increase in the control of viral replication, and positive effects of STI on immune responses in this population should encourage the further development of HIV-specific immune-based therapeutic strategies. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据