4.6 Article

Use of human hepatocyte-like cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells as a model for hepatocytes in hepatitis C virus infection

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.11.007

关键词

Hepatitis C virus; Induced pluripotent stem cell; Hepatocyte; Infection; Replication; Experimental model

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [23659039]
  3. Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24659359, 23659039, 21590831, 21590832] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Host tropism of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is limited to human and chimpanzee. HCV infection has never been fully understood because there are few conventional models for HCV infection. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like (iPS-Hep) cells have been expected to use for drug discovery to predict therapeutic activities and side effects of compounds during the drug discovery process. However, the suitability of iPS-Hep cells as an experimental model for HCV research is not known. Here, we investigated the entry and genomic replication of HCV in iPS-Hep cells by using HCV pseudotype virus (HCVpv) and HCV subgenomic replicons, respectively. We showed that iPS-Hep cells, but not iPS cells, were susceptible to infection with HCVpv. The iPS-Hep cells expressed HCV receptors, including CD81, scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), claudin-1, and occludin; in contrast, the iPS cells showed no expression of SR-BI or claudin-1. HCV RNA genome replication occurred in the iPS-Hep cells. Anti-CD81 antibody, an inhibitor of HCV entry, and interferon, an inhibitor of HCV genomic replication, dose-dependently attenuated HCVpv entry and HCV subgenomic replication in iPS-Hep cells, respectively. These findings suggest that iPS-Hep cells are an appropriate model for HCV infection. (C)2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据