4.7 Article

Corrosion resistance of multi-layered plasma-assisted physical vapour deposition TiN and CrN coatings

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 141, 期 2-3, 页码 164-173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01267-1

关键词

corrosion; multilayer; TiN; CrN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The corrosion resistance of mild steel coated with single layered and multi-layered TIN and CrN coatings has been studied. The base material was coated with TiN and CrN by an electron-beam plasma-assisted physical vapour deposition (PAPVD) technique. 'Single' layers of TIN or CrN, which normally include an interlayer (approx. 100-200 nm) of Ti or Cr under the main TIN or CrN film, were prepared; four layers of TiN (or CrN) were produced by four sequential repetitions of the single-layer process. The microstructural features and corrosion performance were then compared. It is shown that applying four layers of coating can enhance the corrosion performance of PVD TiN and CrN coated mild steel. The corrosion resistance improvement is not only attributed to the increase in thickness, but also to the internal microstructure and phase composition. CrN coatings produced in this work proved to be particularly promising in terms of corrosion resistance, owing to their dense non-columnar structure which contained a mixture of three phases: Cr (b.c.c.), Cr2N (hexagonal) and CrN (f.c.c.). Mild corrosion reactions were observed in CrN coated steel during various electrochemical tests in aqueous salt solution, indicating that inter-phase corrosion had caused a redistribution of the current flow, so as to eliminate current concentration at small through-coating pinholes. This prevented rapid galvanic attack at the coating/substrate interface. More importantly however, in comparison with the columnar structure of TiN coatings, the dense structure with fine equiaxed crystallites made the CrN coatings less permeable to the corrosive medium. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据