4.7 Article

Effect of dose on the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of PLGA and PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 221, 期 1-2, 页码 143-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00676-7

关键词

poly(Lactide-co-glycolide); poly(Lactide-co-glycolide)-monomethoxy(polyethyleneglycol); biodistribution; pharmacokinetics; effect of dose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of nanoparticle dose on the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of conventional PLGA and stealth poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-monomethoxypoly(ethyleneglycol) (PLGA-mPEG) nanoparticles was investigated. The precipitation-solvent diffusion method was used to prepare PLGA and PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles labeled with I-125-cholesterylaniline. These were administered intravenously (i.v.) in mice and at predetermined time intervals the animals were sacrificed and their tissues were excised and assayed for radioactivity. Within the dose range applied in this study, blood clearance and mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) uptake of the PLGA nanoparticles depended on dose whereas they were independent of dose in the case of the PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles. Increasing the dose, decreased the rates of blood clearance and MPS uptake of the PLGA nanoparticles, indicating a certain degree of MPS saturation at higher doses of PLGA nanoparticles. The dose affected the distribution of PLGA nanoparticles between blood and MPS (liver) but it did nut affect the nanoparticle levels in the other tissues. Within the range of doses applied here, the PLGA nanoparticles followed non-linear and dose-dependent pharmacokinetics whereas the PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles followed linear and dose-independent pharmacokinetics. In addition to the prolonged blood residence, the dosage-independence of the pharmacokinetics of the PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles would provide further advantages for their application in controlled drug delivery and in drug targeting. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据