4.6 Article

Evaluation of kidney repair capacity using 99mTc-DMSA in ischemia/reperfusion injury models

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.085

关键词

Renal ischemia/reperfusion; Kidney repair; Tc-99m-DMSA; Imaging

资金

  1. MEST [20090081817, 20090078235]
  2. Brain Korea 21 Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantitative Tc-99m-DMSA renal uptake was studied in different renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) mice models for the assessment of renal repair capacity. Mice models of nephrectomy, uni- and bi-lateral I/R together with sham-operated mice were established. At 1 h, 1 d, 4 d, 1, 2 and 3 wk after I/R, Tc-99m-DMSA (27.7 +/- 1.3 MBq) was injected via tail vein and after 3 h post-injection, the mice were scanned for 30 min with pinhole equipped gamma camera. Higher uptake of Tc-99m-DMSA was measured in normal kidneys of uni-lateral I/R model and nephrectomized kidney I/R model at 3 wk post-surgery. Comparing the restoration capacities of the affected kidneys of nephrectomy, uni- and bi-lateral I/R models, higher repair capacity was observed in the nephrectomized model followed by bi-lateral then uni-lateral models. The normal kidney may retard the restoration of damaged kidney in uni-lateral I/R model. Moreover, 3 wk after Uni-I/R, the size of injured kidney was significantly smaller than non-ischemic contralateral and sham operated kidneys, while nephrectomy I/R kidneys were significantly enlarged compared to all others at 3 wk post-surgery. Very strong correlation between Tc-99m-DMSA uptake and weight of dissected kidneys in I/R models was observed. Consistent with Tc-99m-DMSA uptake results, all histological results indicate that kidney recovery after injury is correlated with the amount of intact tubules and kidney sizes. In summary, our study showed good potentials of Tc-99m-DMSA scan as a promising non-invasive method for evaluation of kidney restoration after I/R injuries. Interestingly, mice with Bi-I/R injury showed faster repair capacity than those with uni-I/R. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据