4.6 Article

Purinergic modulation of glucose uptake into cultured rat podocytes: Effect of diabetic milieu

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.051

关键词

Diabetic milieu; Glucose; Podocytes; Purinoceptors

资金

  1. Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular purines act via P1 and P2 receptors on podocytes and may influence on their function. This action may be modified under various (patho)physiological conditions leading to development of podocytopathy. Aim of study was to investigate effects of diabetic milieu, represented by high glucose concentration (HG, 30 mM glucose) on purinergic-induced changes of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) uptake and on extracellular purines metabolism in cultured rat podocytes. Basal 2-DG uptake was 2.7-fold enhanced in HG compared to normal glucose concentration, NC (1271 +/- 86 vs. 477 +/- 37 nmol/h/mg protein, P < 0.001). ATP stimulated 2-DG uptake by 44 +/- 4% and 29 +/- 5% in NC and HG, respectively. ATP analogues, beta, gamma-methylene ATP and 2-methylthio ATP stimulated 2-DG uptake in range of 18-34% in NC and 16-17% in HG. Benzoylbenzoyl ATP increased 2-DG uptake about 24 +/- 2% in NC however, its effect in HG reached 50 +/- 1%. The antagonists of P2 receptors (suramin, reactive blue 2, PPADS) decreased basal 2-DG uptake in NC and HG; suramin and reactive blue 2 at average of 15 4% in NC but in HG the effect was in following order: suramin 28 +/- 3%; PPADS 20 +/- 3% and RB-2 9 +/- 0.9%. Extracellular adenosine concentration was higher in HG than in NC (0.48 +/- 0.01 vs. 5.05 +/- 0.39 mu M, P < 0.05), however intracellular ATP content and extracellular ATP concentration were not affected. Neither ecto-ATPase nor ecto-5'-nucleotidase activities were affected in FIG. In conclusion, diabetic milieu affects purinergic modulation of glucose transport into podocytes which may play a role in development of diabetic podocytopathy. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据