4.7 Article

Treatment of stroke in rat with intracarotid administration of marrow stromal cells

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 56, 期 12, 页码 1666-1672

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.56.12.1666

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS35504, P01 NS23393] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To measure the therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of stroke with intra-arterial administration of bone marrow stromal cells (MSC). Background: MSC have characteristics of stem and progenitor cells. The hypothesis that MSC injected into the internal carotid artery after stroke enter into ischemic brain and improve neurologic recovery was tested. Methods: Twenty-five adult Wistar rats were subjected to transient (2-hour) middle cerebral artery occlusion alone (n = 9), or treated with intracarotid arterial injection of 200 muL phosphate-buffered saline (n = 8) or 2 x 10(6) MSC in 200 muL phosphate-buffered saline (n = 8) 1 day after ischemia. MSC were harvested and isolated from additional adult rats and then cultured and labeled with bromodeoxyuridine. Rats were subjected to neurologic functional tests (adhesive-removal, modified neurologic severity scores) before and at 1, 7, and 14 days after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify cell-specific proteins of bromodeoxyuridine-reactive MSG. Results: Bromodeoxyuridine-reactive cells (similar to 21% of 2 x 106 injected MSG) distributed throughout the territory of the middle cerebral artery by 14 days after ischemia. Some bromodeoxyuridine-reactive cells expressed proteins characteristic of astrocytes and neurons. Rats with intra-arterial transplantation of MSC exhibited improvement on the adhesive-removal test (p < 0.05) and the modified neurologic severity scores (p < 0.05) at 14 days compared with controls. Conclusions: MSC injected intra-arterially are localized and directed to the territory of the middle cerebral artery, and these cells foster functional improvement after cerebral ischemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据