4.6 Article

Cloning and characterization of the human stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene promoter:: Transcriptional activation by sterol regulatory element binding protein and repression by polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5102

关键词

stearoyl-CoA desaturase; polyunsaturated fatty acids; cholesterol; sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP); transcriptional mechanism

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [BC 980983] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) is a microsomal enzyme required for the biosynthesis of oleate (C18:1) and palmitoleate (C16:1) which are the major monounsaturated fatty acids of membrane phospholipids, triglycerides and cholesterol esters. Previously the full-length human skin cDNA was sequenced and the exon and intron structure of the single functional SCD gene determined. Here we report on the cloning and characterization of the promoter region of the human SCD gene. The human promoter structure is very similar to that of the mouse SCD1 isoform and contains conserved regulatory sequences for the binding of several transcription factors including the sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP), CCAAT enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBP alpha) and nuclear factor-1 (NF-1) that have been shown to transactivate the transcription of the mouse SCD1 gene. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol decreased the SCD promoter-luciferase activity when transiently transfected into HepG2 cells. The decrease in promoter activity correlated with decreases in endogenous SCD mRNA and protein levels. Cotransfection experiment in HepG2 cells showed transactivation of the SCD promoter-luciferase activity by an expression vector containing SREBP-1a and 1c. Our studies indicate that the transcription of the human SCD gene is repressed by polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol and that SREBP plays a role in the transcriptional activation of this gene. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据