4.6 Article

High body mass index does not predict mortality in older people: Analysis of the Longitudinal Study of Aging

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 968-979

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49189.x

关键词

body mass index (BMI); obesity; mortality; older individuals; Cox proportional hazard regression

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [5 K14 HL03163] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To determine the excess mortality associated with obesity (defined by body mass index (BMI)) in older people, with and without adjustment for other risk factors associated with mortality and for demographic factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the Longitudinal Study of Aging (LSOA). SETTING: Nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older people. PARTICIPANTS: Seven thousand five hundred and twenty-seven participants age 70 and older in 1984. MEASUREMENTS: We used Cox regression to calculate proportional hazards ratios for mortality over 96 months. We tested the hypothesis that increased BMI (top 15 %) increased mortality rates in older people. RESULTS: Death occurred in 38% of the cohort: 54% of the thin (lowest 10% of the population, BMI < 19.4 kg/m(2)), 33% of the obese (highest 15%, BMI > 28.5 kg/m(2)), and 37% of the remaining participants (normal) died. Adjustment for demographic factors, health services utilization, and functional status still demonstrated reduced mortality in obese older people (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.77-0.97) compared with normal. After adjustment, thin older people remained more likely to die (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% CI = 1.30-1.64) than normal older people. Sensitivity analyses for income, mortality during the first two years of follow-up, and medical comorbidities did not substantively alter the conclusions. CONCLUSION: Obesity may be protective compared with thinness or normal weight in older community-dwelling Americans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据