4.4 Article

Spatial distributions of soil chemical conditions in a serpentinitic wetland and surrounding landscape

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 1183-1196

出版社

SOIL SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2001.6541183x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soils formed from serpentinite contain an abundance of Fe, Mn, Cr, Ni, and Mg, and low concentrations of the plant-essential nutrients Ca and K. The resulting vegetation is commonly xeromorphic and characteristically stunted. This study was conducted to (i) determine the spatial distributions of heavy metals and exchangeable cations (M-e) in an ultramafic wetland and surrounding landslide terrain, and (U) to interpret the distributions relative to environmental conditions and pedogenic processes on the component landscape positions. Distributions of dithionite-extractable metals (M-d) and M-e in surface soils (0-15 cm depth) were assessed by kriging and by landscape units, characteristic landscape position, soils, and vegetation. Abundance of M(e)s ranked in the following order: Mg > Ca much greater than K > Mn > Na > Ni. The Ca/Mg ratios range from 0.13 to 3.77 (mean 0.43), with the highest ratios in a landscape unit with nonserpentine metamorphic colluvium over serpentinitic residuum. Exchangeable cations are concentrated within the wetland relative to surrounding terrain. Dithionite-extractable Fe, Mn, and Ni are concentrated in soils on the oxidizing, nonhydric lower landscape positions, near the hydrologic discharge point of the wetland. Chromium and Al are concentrated in the nonhydric upper landscape positions. Due to reducing conditions, the wetland contains low concentrations Of M-d relative to the surrounding nonhydric terrain. Large vegetation differences between moisture class coupled with moderate vegetation differences between landscape units within the same moisture class, suggest that vegetation occurrence within the study area is controlled primarily by hydrology, and secondarily by elemental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据