4.7 Article

Short-term estrogen replacement increases β-preprotachykinin mRNA levels in uninjured dorsal root ganglion neurons, but not in axotomized neurons

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 170, 期 1, 页码 101-108

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7697

关键词

primary afferents; NGF; substance P; female; hormone replacement; pain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons that mediate nociception express the high affinity NGF receptor (trkA) gene and the preprotachykinin (PPT) gene. NGF has been shown to regulate both of these DRG neuronal genes. Our laboratory has shown that these genes are also regulated by estrogen. Longterm daily estrogen replacement, in adult ovariectomized (OVX) rats, causes a coordinate decline in trkA and beta -PPT mRNA levels in lumbar DRG neurons, while short-term estrogen replacement increases trkA mRNA levels in uninjured as well as in axotomized lumbar DRG neurons. The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that short-term estrogen replacement increases DRG beta -PPT mRNA levels in lumbar DRG neurons of OVX rats and that the increase is dependent on target-derived NGF. Sciatic nerve transection (SNT) was used to eliminate target-derived NGF in L4 and L5 DRGs in adult OVX rats. Seven days later, one-half of the SNT and one-half of the animals that had received sham sciatic nerve transactions (SHAM) received two daily injections of estradiol benzoate (EB), The remaining rats received two daily injections of vehicle alone. Quantitative in situ hybridization analyses of sections from L4 and L5 DRGs showed that two daily injections of EB significantly increased beta -PPT mRNA levels in DRGs of SHAM animals, but had no effect on beta -PPT mRNA levels in DRGs from SNT animals. These data coupled with our earlier observations of the effect of short-term estrogen replacement on DRG trkA mRNA levels, indicate that the regulation of DRG beta -PPT mRNA levels by estrogen requires target-derived NGF. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据