4.6 Article

Crystal Structure of the Vaccinia Virus Uracil-DNA Glycosylase in Complex with DNA

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 290, 期 29, 页码 17923-17934

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.648352

关键词

-

资金

  1. ANR [ANR-13-BSV8-0014]
  2. Service de Sante des Armees
  3. Delegation Generale pour l'Armement
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-BSV8-0014] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vaccinia virus polymerase holoenzyme is composed of the DNA polymerase catalytic subunit E9 associated with its heterodimeric co-factor A20.D4 required for processive genome synthesis. Although A20 has no known enzymatic activity, D4 is an active uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG). The presence of a repair enzyme as a component of the viral replication machinery suggests that, for poxviruses, DNA synthesis and base excision repair is coupled. We present the 2.7 A crystal structure of the complex formed by D4 and the first 50 amino acids of A20 (D4.A20(1-50)) bound to a 10-mer DNA duplex containing an abasic site resulting from the cleavage of a uracil base. Comparison of the viral complex with its human counterpart revealed major divergences in the contacts between protein and DNA and in the enzyme orientation on the DNA. However, the conformation of the dsDNA within both structures is very similar, suggesting a dominant role of the DNA conformation for UNG function. In contrast to human UNG, D4 appears rigid, and we do not observe a conformational change upon DNA binding. We also studied the interaction of D4.A20(1-50) with different DNA oligomers by surface plasmon resonance. D4 binds weakly to nonspecific DNA and to uracil-containing substrates but binds abasic sites with a K-d of <1.4 mu M. This second DNA complex structure of a family I UNG gives new insight into the role of D4 as a co-factor of vaccinia virus DNA polymerase and allows a better understanding of the structural determinants required for UNG action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据