4.8 Article

Quantitative in vivo measurement of glutathione in Arabidopsis cells

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 67-78

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01071.x

关键词

glutathione; monochlorobimane; glutathione S-transferase; fluorimetry; laser scanning microscopy; stereology; Arabidopsis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new, non-destructive assay is described to quantify cytoplasmic glutathione (GSH) levels in vivo in single cells or populations of cells from Arabidopsis suspension cultures. Cytoplasmic GSH was labelled with monochlorobimane (MCB) in situ to give a fluorescent GSH-bimane (GSB) conjugate. At low (10-100 muM) concentrations of MCB, labelling was mediated by a glutathione S-transferase, which confers specificity for GSH. HPLC analysis of MCB-labelled low molecular-weight thiols showed that the assay measures the total GSH pool, including the oxidized glutathione. The progress curve for the labelling could be described using Michaelis-Menten kinetics with an apparent K-M of 40 mum and V-max of 470 mu mol I-cyt(-1) min(-1). There was no evidence for de novo synthesis of GSH during the labelling period of 2 h, suggesting that control of GSH synthesis is not mediated by feedback control of gamma -glutamylcysteine synthetase in this system. The total cellular level of GSH was calculated from the plateau value of the progress curve, after appropriate calibration, as 830-942 nmol g(-1) FW. The volume fraction of cytoplasm was measured from serial optical sections of bimane-labelled cells collected by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) with excitation 442 nm, or two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM) with excitation 770 nm. A value of 42 +/- 3% cytoplasm was determined by manual segmentation, and a value of 37 +/- 2% using stereological techniques. Using these figures, values for cytoplasmic [GSH] were estimated to be between 2.7 +/- 0.3 and 3.2 +/- 0.3 mm for cell populations. In addition, measurement of GSH levels in individual cells using CLSM and TPLSM gave values of 3.0 +/- 0.5 and 3.5 +/- 0.7 mM, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据