4.7 Article

Dietary potassium intake and risk of stroke in US men and women - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study

期刊

STROKE
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1473-1479

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1473

关键词

cardiovascular diseases; cerebrovascular disorders; potassium, dietary; prospective study

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R03 HL-61954] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-The few prospective studies that have explored the association between dietary intake of potassium and risk of stroke have reported inconsistent findings. This study examines the relationship between dietary potassium intake and the risk of stroke in a representative sample of the US general population. Methods-Study participants included 9805 US men and women who participated in the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study. Dietary potassium and total energy intake were estimated at baseline by using a 24-hour dietary recall. Incidence data for stroke and coronary heart disease were obtained from medical records and death certificates. Results-Over an average of 19 years of follow up, 927 stroke events and 1847 coronary heart disease events were documented. Overall, stroke hazard was significantly different among quartiles of potassium intake (likelihood ratio P=0.03); however, a test of linear trend across quartiles did not reach a customary level of statistical significance (P=0.14), Participants consuming a low potassium diet at baseline (< 34.6 mmol potassium per day) experienced a 28% higher hazard of stroke (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.47; P <0.001) than other participants, after adjustment for established cardiovascular disease risk factors. Conclusions-These findings suggest that low dietary potassium intake is associated with an increased risk of stroke. However, the possibility that the association is due to residual confounding cannot be entirely ruled out in this observational study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据