4.4 Article

Drug-induced potentiation of prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex in mice: a model for detecting antipsychotic activity?

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 156, 期 2-3, 页码 273-283

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002130100763

关键词

schizophrenia; prepulse inhibition; startle habituation; antipsychotic; mice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Schizophrenic patients typically have impaired startle habituation (SH) and prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI). PPI can be disrupted in rats by psychomimetics, and drug-induced reversal of this deficit is considered to predict potential antipsychotic properties. Certain strains of mice, such as C57BL/6J, naturally display poor PPI. Objective: To test whether mice spontaneously showing low levels of PPI might prove a useful tool for detecting novel antipsychotics. Methods: PPI and SH were evaluated in four strains of mice: BALB/cByJ, MORO, 129/SvEv and C57BL/6J. The effects of antipsychotic [haloperidol (1, 3 and 6 mg/kg), clozapine (0.3, 1, 3 and 30 mg/kg) and risperidone (0.1, 0.3 and 1 mg/kg,)] and non-antipsychotic [diazepam (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg), buspirone (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg), desipramine (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg), morphine (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) and scopolamine (0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg)] drug treatments were studied on PPI. Results: Haloperidol (6 mg/kg), clozapine (3 and 30 mg/kg), and risperidone (1 mg/kg) all significantly enhanced PPI in C57BL/6J. All non-antipsychotics failed to improve PPI in this strain, except diazepam. Facilitation of PPI was also obtained in the other strains; however, clear interstrain differences were observed depending on the class of antipsychotic used and on the level of prepulse intensity. Conclusion: Anti psychotic-induced facilitation of PPI is clearly detected in mice naturally exhibiting poor levels of sensorimotor gating (e.g., C57BL/6J), but is also observed in other strains of mice. The use of this procedure as a potential screening test for detecting novel antipsychotic medications is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据