4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Morphologic properties of neoplastic mast cells: delineation of stages of maturation and implication for cytological grading of mastocytosis

期刊

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 529-536

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2126(01)00041-8

关键词

mast cells; mastocytosis; morphology; classification; disease criteria; grading

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, cytological properties of bone marrow mast cells (MC) were analyzed and correlated with clinical parameters in 69 patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM). Based on cytomorphological features. four distinct cell types were recorded: (i) typical tissue MC (round cells, well granulated, round central nuclei), (ii) atypical MC exhibiting elongated cytoplasmic extensions, oval nuclei with excentric position, and a hypogranulated cytoplasm with focal granule accumulation ('atypical MC type I'); (iii) atypical MC with bi- or multilobed nuclei ('atypical MC type II'); and (iv) metachromatically granulated blast-like cells. In the majority of cases with SM, the percentage of MC in bone marrow (bm) smears was less than 5% (of all nucleated bm cells), and the predominant types were typical MC or atypical MC type I. In a smaller group of patients, the percentage of MC was greater than 5% and a significant subset of MC (greater than or equal to 10%) were classified as 'metachromatic blasts' and/or atypical MC type II. These patients had a significantly shorter survival (P < 0.05) and most of them were found to lack UP-like skin lesions. A percentage of MC greater than or equal to 20% was invariably associated with the diagnosis 'mast cell leukemia'. Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic value of the cytology in SM and identified the percentage of MC (of all nucleated bm cells) as an independent prognostic variable. These data suggest that cytomorphological assessment of bm MC in SM is an important diagnostic approach that may help to delineate between;variants of the disease. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据