4.7 Article

Vitamin D status and redefining serum parathyroid hormone reference range in the elderly

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 86, 期 7, 页码 3086-3090

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.86.7.3086

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subclinical vitamin D insufficiency is characterized by mild secondary hyperparathyroidism and enhanced risk of osteoporotic fracture. However, although low revels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (250HD) are common in otherwise normal elderly people, vitamin D status has not generally been taken into -account in the previously published reference values for serum PTH. We measured fasting morning serum (obtained from April through June) PTH, total calcium, albumin, phosphate, creatinine, bone markers, and 250HD in 280 healthy subjects (140 men and 140 women), aged 60 -79 yr. Serum PTH was measured by means of 2 immunoradiometric,assays, the Allegro intact PTH assay (Nichols-Institute Diagnostics) and the new CAP assay (Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc.). We found a high prevalence (167 of 280; 59.6%) of low 250HD (less than or equal to 30 nmol/L) in these otherwise healthy individuals. The PTH concentrations (95% confidence interval) obtained in the whole group of 280 subjects ranged from 13-64 ng/L for the Allegro assay and from 10-44 ng/L for the CAP assay. In the subjects with a serum 250HD concentration greater than 30 nmol/L, values for both PTH assays were lower, 10-46 and 9-34ng/L for the Allegro and the CAP assays, respectively. By using these values as a reference range, approximately 25% of the subjects with a serum 250HD level of 30 nnol/L or less had a high serum PTH level (whatever the assay), reflecting secondary hyperparathyroidism. This might be missed if the reference PTH values are those obtained in the entire group, as is usually done. These results strongly suggest that vitamin D status should be taken into account when establishing reference values for serum PTH in elderly subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据