4.5 Article

Temporal and spatial dynamics of coarse woody debris in harvested and unharvested lodgepole pine forests

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 141, 期 1-3, 页码 125-149

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00269-1

关键词

coarse woody debris; lodgepole pine; Pinus contorta; fire ecology; timber harvest; Yellowstone National Park; simulation models; clearcutting vs. natural fires; forest floor coverage by CWD; CWD biomass created by disturbance; lodgepole pine fire-return intervals; post-harvest slash treatment; CWD effects on soil development; rates of CWD production; historic range of variability

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coarse woody debris (CWD) biomass was measured and mapped in burned. clearcut, and intact lodgepole pine forests in two areas of the Rocky Mountains of Wyoming: the Medicine Bow National Forest (MBNF) and Yellowstone National Park (YNP). In addition, the amount of CWD consumed or converted to charcoal by fire was estimated in a recently burned stand in YNP. A spatially explicit simulation model (DEADWOOD) was then created to simulate the effects of various clearcutting and fire regimes on CWD over a 1000-yr period. Approximately 8% of downed CWD were consumed during a single fire and an additional 8%) was converted to charcoal. After 1000 yr of simulation, 100-yr fire-return intervals produced CWD that occupied more of the forest floor than did 200- or 300-yr intervals. The time required for 100%,. occupancy of the forest floor by CWD was 1125, 1350, and 1300 yr for 100-, 200-, and 300-yr fire-return intervals, respectively. Simulations suggest that current harvest and post-harvest slash treatment regimes will require at least four centuries longer for 100% of the forest floor to be occupied by CWD (1800-3600 yr) than under fire regimes. This may have important effects on soil characteristics. Only when post-harvest CWD slash was doubled over the current amounts did clearcutting leave sufficient CWD to maintain forest floor CWD within the historic range of variability for naturally developing post-fire stands. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据