4.6 Article

Activation of toll-like receptor-2 by glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors from a protozoan parasite

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 167, 期 1, 页码 416-423

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.416

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI32725] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK50305] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM54060] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors and glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs) from parasitic protozoa have been shown to exert a wide variety of effects on cells of the host innate immune system. However, the receptor(s) that are triggered by these protozoan glycolipids has not been identified. Here we present evidence that Trypanosoma cruzi-derived GPI anchors and GIPLs trigger CD25 expression on Chinese hamster ovary-KI cells transfected with CD14 and Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2), but not wild-type (TLR-2-deficient) Chinese hamster ovary cells. The protozoan-derived GPI anchors and GIPLs containing alkylacyl-glycerol and saturated fatty acid chains or ceramide were found to be active in a concentration range of 100 nM to 1 muM. More importantly, the GPI anchors purified from T. cruzi trypomastigotes, which contain a longer glycan core and unsaturated fatty acids in the sn-2 position of the alkylacylglycerolipid component, triggered TLR-2 at subnanomolar concentrations. We performed experiments with macrophages from TLR-2 knockout and TLR-4 knockout mice, and found that TLR-2 expression appears to be essential for induction of IL-12, TNF-alpha, and NO by GPI anchors derived from T. cruzi trypomastigotes. Thus, highly purified GPI anchors from T. cruzi parasites are potent activators of TLR-2 from both mouse and human origin. The activation of TLR-2 may initiate host innate defense mechanisms and inflammatory response during protozoan infection, and may provide new strategies for immune intervention during protozoan infections. The Journal of Immunology, 2001.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据