4.7 Article

Structure of the Bacillus cell fate determinant SpollAA in phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms

期刊

STRUCTURE
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 605-614

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2

关键词

cell differentiation; crystallography; phosphorylation; sigma factor; sporulation; SpollAA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The asymmetric cell division during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis gives rise to two compartments: the mother cell and the forespore. Each follow different programs of gene expression coordinated by a succession of alternate RNA polymerase a factors. The activity of the first of these sigma factors, sigma (F), is restricted to the forespore although sigma (F) is present in the predivisional cell and partitions into both compartments following the asymmetric septation. For sigma (F) to become active, it must escape from a complex with its cognate anti-sigma factor, SpollAB. This relief from SpollAB inhibition requires the dephosphorylation of the anti-sigma factor antagonist, SpollAA. The phosphorylation state of SpollAA is thus a key determinant of sigma (F) activity and cell fate. Results: We have solved the crystal structures of SpollAA from Bacillus sphaericus in its phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms. The overall structure consists of a central beta -pleated sheet, one face of which is buried by a pair of alpha helices, while the other is largely exposed to solvent. The site of phosphorylation, Ser(57), is located at the N terminus of helix alpha2. The phosphoserine is exceptionally well defined in the 1.2 Angstrom electron density maps, revealing that the structural changes accompanying phosphorylation are slight. Conclusions: Comparison of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated SpollAA shows that covalent modification has no significant effect on the global structure of the protein. The phosphoryl group has a passive role as a negatively charged flag rather than the active role it plays as a nucleus of structural reorganization in many eukaryotic signaling systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据