4.8 Article

Ultrasonic echolucent carotid plaques predict future strokes

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 104, 期 1, 页码 68-73

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc2601.091704

关键词

arteriosclerosis; stroke; carotid arteries; ultrasonics; follow-up studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-We tested prospectively the hypothesis that stroke development call be predicted by ec echolucency of carotid atherosclerotic plaques in previously symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Methods and Results-We followed incidence of ipsilateral ischemic strokes for 4.4 pears in 111 asymptomatic and 135 symptomatic patients with greater than or equal to 50% relevant carotid artery stenosis. At inclusion. echogenicity of carotid plaques and degree of stenosis were evaluated with high-resolution B-mode ultrasound with computer-assisted image processing and Doppler ultrasound, respectively. We observed 44 ipsilateral ischemic strokes. In symptomatic patients, relative risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke for echolucent versus echorich plaques was 3.1 (95% CI. 1.3 to 7.3), whereas for 80% to 99% versus 50% to 79% stenosis, the relative risk was 1.4 (95% CI. 0.7 to 3.0). Relative to symptomatic patients with echorich 50% to 79% stenotic plaques, those with echorich 80% to 99% stenotic plaques, echolucent 50% to 79% stenotic plaques, and echolucent 80% to 99% stenotic plaques had relative risks of ipsilaterul ischemic strokes of 3.1 (95% CI, 0.7 to 14), 4.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to 15), and 7.9 (95% CI, 2.1 to 30), equivalent to absolute risk increases of 11%, 18%, and 28%, This was not observed in previously asymptomatic patients. Conclusions-Echolucent plaques causing greater than or equal to 50% diameter stcnosis by Doppler ultrasound are associated with risk of future stroke in symptomatic but not asymptomatic individuals. This suggests that measurement of echolucency, together with degree of stenosis, may improve selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据