4.8 Article

Prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 191-196

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.104.2.191

关键词

endothelium; cardiovascular diseases; hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Forearm endothelial dysfunction, characterized by an impaired vasodilating response to acetylcholine (ACh), may be associated with several cardiovascular risk factors, including essential hypertension. Although the prognostic value of coronary endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated, that of forearm endothelial dysfunction is still unknown. Methods and Results-Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation was investigated in 225 never-treated hypertensive patients (age, 35 to 54 years) by intra-arterial infusion of increasing doses of ACh and sodium nitroprusside. Patients were divided into tertiles on the basis of their increase in ACh-stimulated forearm blood flow (FBF) from basal: group 1, from 30% to 184%; group 2, from 185% to 333%; and group 3, from 339% to 760% increase from basal. During a mean follow-up of 31.5 of months (range, 4 to 84 months), there were 29 major adverse events at the cardiac (n=19), cerebrovascular (n=9), or peripheral vascular (n=1) level. Events included myocardial infarction, angina, coronary revascularization procedures, stroke, transient cerebral ischemic attack, and aortoiliac occlusive disease. Event rate per 100 patient-years was 8.17, 4.34, and 2.02 in the first, second, and third tertiles of peak percent increase in FBF during ACh infusion. The excess risk associated with an FBF increase in the first tertile was significant (relative risk, 2.084; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.48; P=0.0049) after controlling for individual risk markers, including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Conclusions-Our data suggest that forearm endothelial dysfunction is a marker of future cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据