4.7 Article

BIO-SAFE: a method for evaluation of biodiversity values on the basis of political and legal criteria

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 121-137

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00149-9

关键词

biodiversity assessment; nature conservation policy; ecotopes; rivers; floodplains

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a Spreadsheet Application For Evaluation of BIOdiversity (BIO-SAFE) on the basis of political and legal criteria derived from national and international policy plans, laws, treaties and directives. The BIG-SAFE is developed as a management tool to optimise mutual attuning of nature conservation policies and other interests in spatial planning. Fields of application of BIG-SAFE comprise designs and evaluations of physical planning projects, environmental impact assessments and comparative landscape-ecological studies. Taxonomic groups involved in BIG-SAFE are higher plants, dragonflies and damselflies, butterflies, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. The development of BIG-SAFE was based on species characteristic of rivers and their floodplains, but the principles of the method can easily be applied to other ecosystems as well. The BIG-SAFE has been applied on behalf of a combined flood risk reduction and ecological rehabilitation plan for the Rijnwaarden floodplains (River Rhine, the Netherlands). Application to flora and fauna data available for this area showed that the BIG-SAFE method enables the user to express politically and legally based biodiversity values in quantitative terms and to compare biodiversity values for various taxonomic groups, landscape-ecological units (e.g. ecotopes) and physical planning scenarios, By linking habitat preferences of the species selected to ecotopes, the method also allows the user to derive relevant information at the ecosystem level. Because of its policy-based character, BIG-SAFE yields complementary information to more established ecological biodiversity indices. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据