4.6 Article

Costimulation blockade, busulfan, and bone marrow promote titratable macrochimerism, induce transplantation tolerance, and correct genetic hemoglobinopathies with minimal myelosuppression

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 167, 期 2, 页码 1103-1111

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.2.1103

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 74364-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 44644] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK/AI 41519] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed hemopoietic chimerism has the potential to correct genetic hemological diseases (sickle cell anemia, thalassemia) and eliminate chronic immunosuppressive therapy following organ transplantation. To date, most strategies require either recipient conditioning (gamma -irradiation, depletion of the peripheral immune system) or administration of mega doses of bone marrow to facilitate reliable engraftment. Although encouraging, many issues remain that may restrict or prevent clinical application of such strategies. We describe an alternative, nonirradiation based strategy using a single dose of busulfan, costimulation blockade, and T cell-depleted donor bone marrow, which promotes titratable macrochimerism and a reshaping of the T cell repertoire. Chimeras exhibit robust donor-specific tolerance, evidenced by acceptance of fully allogeneic skin grafts and failure to generate donor-specific proliferative responses in an in vivo graft-versus-host disease model of alloreactivity. In this model, donor cell infusion and costimulation blockade without busulfan were insufficient for tolerance induction as donor-specific IFN-gamma -producing T cells re-emerged and skin grafts were rejected at similar to 100 days. When applied to a murine beta -thalassemia model, this approach allows for the normalization of hemologic parameters and replacement of the diseased red cell compartment. Such a protocol may allow for clinical application of mixed chimerism strategies in patients with end-stage organ disease or hemoglobinopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据