4.2 Article

Net growth rates of picocyanobacteria and nano-/microphytoplankton inhabiting shelf waters of the central (17°S) and southern (20°S) Great Barrier Reef

期刊

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 209-224

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame024209

关键词

Synechococcus; Prochlorococcus; tropical nano-/microphytoplankton; growth rates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growth rates of diffusion cultures of nano- and microphytoplankton from Great Barrier Reef shelf water, especially diatoms (mu (max) = 3.2 doublings d(-1)), exceeded those of picocyanobacteria (Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus) when DIN (NH4+ + No-2(-) + NO3-) concentrations were greater than or equal to0.05 muM. The picocyanobacteria (mu (max) = 1.1 and 1.6 doublings d(-1) for Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus respectively) achieved higher relative and absolute growth rates when time-averaged DIN concentrations were <0.05 muM. Most estimates (71 %) of in situ growth rates of nano-/microphytoplankton were less than or equal to 0.25 of mu (max) when DIN concentrations were <0.1 muM, while only 18 % of in situ picocyanobacteria growth rates were less than or equal to0.25 of mu (max) when DIN concentrations were <0.1 muM, the majority being greater than or equal to0.50 of mu (max) at such DIN concentrations. Thus growth rates of Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus populations did not appear to be significantly nutrient (nitrogen)-limited under ambient concentrations, and were of similar order to those measured in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, where NO3- concentrations (>2 muM) are far above growth-saturating levels, and in the oligotrophic North Pacific Gyre. In contrast, for those nano-/microphytoplankton for which in situ or simulated in situ growth rates were estimated, growth rates appeared to be nitrogen-limited at DIN concentrations <0.1 muM. The results provide further support for the hypothesis that picocyanobacteria dominate oligotrophic marine water columns because of their superior ability to grow at low nutrient concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据